2004-05-08 Trunk builds
- Fixed: 242915 - PNG out-of-bounds read during error message processing
- Fixed: 232567 - Warn when username/password is part of a URL
- Fixed: 214843 - Space doesn't scroll when link's child has focus
- Fixed: 241621 - space doesn't scroll when XHTML link has focus
- Fixed: 237760 - Recursive iframe loading by Mozilla, not in IE, because iframe's location is not directly available - M17rc1 [@ nsHTMLReflowState::Init]
- Since May ?: 243066 - just-loaded page blanks for a second
- Since May 6: 242856 - Slow image rendering.
- Since ~May 5: 242745 - trackpoint scrolling support broken
- Since ~May 4: 242691 - Animated gifs do not animate properly.
- Since May 1: 242709, 242494, 242439 - Can't submit some forms.
- Since ~Apr 30: 242275 - browser window hangs on https certificate dialog (installer builds only).
- Since ~Apr 26: 241865 - Drag-n-drop link to download manager doesn't work.
Official Windows,
Official Windows installer
(discussion),
Lohvarn's builds,
BlueFyre's O2 G7 SSE,
bangbang's O2 G7 SSE2
Lohvarn made branch builds in addition to trunk builds.
Official Linux,
no official gtk2+xft builds,
aebrahim's gtk2+xft
May 8th, 2004 at 9:23 pm
still no mention of this bug?
http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=239722
May 8th, 2004 at 9:52 pm
Are you back to consistent updates of The Burning Edge?
May 9th, 2004 at 12:02 am
Bug #243066 is pretty irritating.
May 9th, 2004 at 1:05 am
Also ran into Bug #243066, thought it was just me. Is it trunk only?
May 9th, 2004 at 3:56 am
bug 243066 is from may 6th build, may 5th build does not exhibit the problem
So it might as well be that this bug is caused by the same issue as the slow image rendering bug…
May 10th, 2004 at 1:52 am
Bug 242823 seems to be the same.
May 10th, 2004 at 8:33 am
I have an idea for your site:
How about you start reporting on the branch builds instead of the trunk builds. Peter is already doing a daily thread on the MozillaZine forum about the trunk builds. Your work about the trunks is nice, it gives a quick overview over the bugs, but it is a bit silly to have two people doing the same job.
Mozilla Firefox 0.9 and 1.0 will be based on the 1.7 branch and I think we could need a site dedicated reporting about the bugs and regressions on the branch.
For example you could do a weekly thread about the branch builds in the weekend so you can focus on your studies.
May 10th, 2004 at 3:48 pm
The bug fix for “View source” will soon be complete. http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=222157
May 10th, 2004 at 9:36 pm
Using OSX? I recommend the unofficial build available through links in this discussion:
http://forums.mozillazine.org/viewtopic.php?p=520860#520860
May 11th, 2004 at 10:16 am
jacob: I dare say that Burning Edge was here before Peter started doing his thing in the MozillaZine forums. Perhaps you should talk to Peter about focusing on the branch builds.
May 11th, 2004 at 12:27 pm
And dare I say Peter(6) rips most of his info from The Burning Edge.
May 11th, 2004 at 6:57 pm
JamezPR:
Hardly; those threads are out before the Burning Edge posts. The difference is that Peter(6) basically does a dump of all checkins from Bonsai, resulting in fixes listed that don’t affect Firefox or that are obscure enough that knowing they’re fixed is useless. Witness the fixes for Mozilla-specific code that get listed and the backend fixes whose effects are barely noticeable.
Each info source has a use; Peter(6)’s threads are good for the anal who wish to know about *every* fix, while the Burning Edge is for more targeted and useful information about nightly builds.
May 12th, 2004 at 1:27 am
You know, having Peter(6) and The Burning Edge is better than having neither.It just seems silly to me to expect an established and permanent website such as The Burning Edge to switch gears and focus on something as sporadic as branch builds.
May 12th, 2004 at 3:44 pm
Jeff Walden:
Point taken; Comment retracted; Apologies to everyone; Yall know how it is when you flustered. One day I may be as level-headed as Jeff then again, maybe not.