<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 2009-03-04 Trunk builds</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.squarefree.com/burningedge/2009/03/04/2009-03-04-trunk-builds/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.squarefree.com/burningedge/2009/03/04/2009-03-04-trunk-builds/</link>
	<description>Developments in nightly builds of Mozilla Firefox</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 12 Dec 2011 19:17:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Helder Magalhães</title>
		<link>http://www.squarefree.com/burningedge/2009/03/04/2009-03-04-trunk-builds/comment-page-1/#comment-5180</link>
		<dc:creator>Helder Magalhães</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2009 11:55:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.squarefree.com/burningedge/?p=730#comment-5180</guid>
		<description>@Jesse

How come my previous comment (&quot;March 12th, 2009 at 2:48 am&quot;) states &quot;Your comment is awaiting moderation. &quot; but there&#039;s 30+ spam messages here? ;-)

I&#039;d say that a (re)captcha [1] is in need here... :-)

Regards,
 Helder Magalhães

[1] http://recaptcha.net/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Jesse</p>
<p>How come my previous comment (&#8220;March 12th, 2009 at 2:48 am&#8221;) states &#8220;Your comment is awaiting moderation. &#8221; but there&#8217;s 30+ spam messages here? ;-)</p>
<p>I&#8217;d say that a (re)captcha [1] is in need here&#8230; :-)</p>
<p>Regards,<br />
 Helder Magalhães</p>
<p>[1] <a href="http://recaptcha.net/" rel="nofollow">http://recaptcha.net/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Helder Magalhães</title>
		<link>http://www.squarefree.com/burningedge/2009/03/04/2009-03-04-trunk-builds/comment-page-1/#comment-5143</link>
		<dc:creator>Helder Magalhães</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2009 10:48:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.squarefree.com/burningedge/?p=730#comment-5143</guid>
		<description>I&#039;d say that SMIL animation in SVG [1] should also deserve some credit. :-)
To try it out, one just needs to set &#039;svg.smil.enabled&#039; to &#039;true&#039; in &#039;about:config&#039; and may go for some bug hunt -- several SVG+SMIL samples are available [2]. ;-)
One should be aware that there are several known limitations in the implementation [3], reason why this will not be made the default, at least for now.

Cheers,
 Helder

[1] https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=473705
[2] http://srufaculty.sru.edu/david.dailey/svg/SVGAnimations.htm#SMIL
[3] https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=482402</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d say that SMIL animation in SVG [1] should also deserve some credit. :-)<br />
To try it out, one just needs to set &#8216;svg.smil.enabled&#8217; to &#8216;true&#8217; in &#8216;about:config&#8217; and may go for some bug hunt &#8212; several SVG+SMIL samples are available [2]. ;-)<br />
One should be aware that there are several known limitations in the implementation [3], reason why this will not be made the default, at least for now.</p>
<p>Cheers,<br />
 Helder</p>
<p>[1] <a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=473705" rel="nofollow">https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=473705</a><br />
[2] <a href="http://srufaculty.sru.edu/david.dailey/svg/SVGAnimations.htm#SMIL" rel="nofollow">http://srufaculty.sru.edu/david.dailey/svg/SVGAnimations.htm#SMIL</a><br />
[3] <a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=482402" rel="nofollow">https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=482402</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Helder Magalhães</title>
		<link>http://www.squarefree.com/burningedge/2009/03/04/2009-03-04-trunk-builds/comment-page-1/#comment-5142</link>
		<dc:creator>Helder Magalhães</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Mar 2009 09:55:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.squarefree.com/burningedge/?p=730#comment-5142</guid>
		<description>&gt; On the other hand, I’m experiencing serious layout issues with JIT enabled for a while

This was recently reported as bug 481869 [1].

Hope this helps,
 Helder Magalhães

[1] https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=481869</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&gt; On the other hand, I’m experiencing serious layout issues with JIT enabled for a while</p>
<p>This was recently reported as bug 481869 [1].</p>
<p>Hope this helps,<br />
 Helder Magalhães</p>
<p>[1] <a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=481869" rel="nofollow">https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=481869</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Helder Magalhães</title>
		<link>http://www.squarefree.com/burningedge/2009/03/04/2009-03-04-trunk-builds/comment-page-1/#comment-5141</link>
		<dc:creator>Helder Magalhães</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2009 17:49:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.squarefree.com/burningedge/?p=730#comment-5141</guid>
		<description>&gt; Please give these builds extra testing.
&gt; The changes for synchronous XMLHttpRequests are big and scary [...]

Quick tests showed that sync. XMLHttpRequest seem to be running as expected. :-)  Nevertheless, they are highly discouraged for a number of reasons...

On the other hand, I&#039;m experiencing serious layout issues with JIT enabled for a while: apparently, missing elements during complex DOM manipulations. :-(  Is anyone aware of such an issue? Links to pages and/or bug reports would be appreciated. ;-)  I haven&#039;t been able to reduce a test case yet, although more information is available [1] (including steps to reproduce, although the samples are based in a widget library). Sorry if this sounds a bit off-topic but, as Firefox 3.1 is reaching beta 3, I fear that this may become the source of a lot of frustration if not properly isolated in time for the final release...

Best regards,
 Helder Magalhães

[1] http://bugzilla.qooxdoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1664</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&gt; Please give these builds extra testing.<br />
&gt; The changes for synchronous XMLHttpRequests are big and scary [...]</p>
<p>Quick tests showed that sync. XMLHttpRequest seem to be running as expected. :-)  Nevertheless, they are highly discouraged for a number of reasons&#8230;</p>
<p>On the other hand, I&#8217;m experiencing serious layout issues with JIT enabled for a while: apparently, missing elements during complex DOM manipulations. :-(  Is anyone aware of such an issue? Links to pages and/or bug reports would be appreciated. ;-)  I haven&#8217;t been able to reduce a test case yet, although more information is available [1] (including steps to reproduce, although the samples are based in a widget library). Sorry if this sounds a bit off-topic but, as Firefox 3.1 is reaching beta 3, I fear that this may become the source of a lot of frustration if not properly isolated in time for the final release&#8230;</p>
<p>Best regards,<br />
 Helder Magalhães</p>
<p>[1] <a href="http://bugzilla.qooxdoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1664" rel="nofollow">http://bugzilla.qooxdoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1664</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

