<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 2006-12-13 Trunk builds</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.squarefree.com/burningedge/2006/12/13/2006-12-13-trunk-builds/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.squarefree.com/burningedge/2006/12/13/2006-12-13-trunk-builds/</link>
	<description>Developments in nightly builds of Mozilla Firefox</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jul 2008 11:06:18 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://www.squarefree.com/burningedge/2006/12/13/2006-12-13-trunk-builds/#comment-4119</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Dec 2006 11:27:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.squarefree.com/burningedge/2006/12/13/2006-12-13-trunk-builds/#comment-4119</guid>
		<description>My nose is off by one pixel too. Breathing works fine. ;-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My nose is off by one pixel too. Breathing works fine. ;-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jesse Ruderman</title>
		<link>http://www.squarefree.com/burningedge/2006/12/13/2006-12-13-trunk-builds/#comment-4118</link>
		<dc:creator>Jesse Ruderman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Dec 2006 11:14:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.squarefree.com/burningedge/2006/12/13/2006-12-13-trunk-builds/#comment-4118</guid>
		<description>Artem, is it worse on trunk than on branch?  Or are you using a special build that uses Places?

You'll be happy to know that the patch in bug 355738 (history-on-places) just got a patch and has r+.  I'm guessing it will be checked in Friday.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Artem, is it worse on trunk than on branch?  Or are you using a special build that uses Places?</p>
<p>You&#8217;ll be happy to know that the patch in bug 355738 (history-on-places) just got a patch and has r+.  I&#8217;m guessing it will be checked in Friday.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Artem S. Tashkinov</title>
		<link>http://www.squarefree.com/burningedge/2006/12/13/2006-12-13-trunk-builds/#comment-4117</link>
		<dc:creator>Artem S. Tashkinov</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Dec 2006 05:41:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.squarefree.com/burningedge/2006/12/13/2006-12-13-trunk-builds/#comment-4117</guid>
		<description>Until history backend is moved to SQLite I don't see any reason for using a trunk. My history is set to 180 days and FF is sluggish as hell (using 100% of CPU) when I try to browse it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Until history backend is moved to SQLite I don&#8217;t see any reason for using a trunk. My history is set to 180 days and FF is sluggish as hell (using 100% of CPU) when I try to browse it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jesse Ruderman</title>
		<link>http://www.squarefree.com/burningedge/2006/12/13/2006-12-13-trunk-builds/#comment-4116</link>
		<dc:creator>Jesse Ruderman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Dec 2006 12:17:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.squarefree.com/burningedge/2006/12/13/2006-12-13-trunk-builds/#comment-4116</guid>
		<description>It is ok for the nose to be off by one pixel.  See https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=343583#c6 from Ian Hickson, the author of the Acid 2 test.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is ok for the nose to be off by one pixel.  See <a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=343583#c6" rel="nofollow">https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=343583#c6</a> from Ian Hickson, the author of the Acid 2 test.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Laurens Holst</title>
		<link>http://www.squarefree.com/burningedge/2006/12/13/2006-12-13-trunk-builds/#comment-4115</link>
		<dc:creator>Laurens Holst</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Dec 2006 09:36:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.squarefree.com/burningedge/2006/12/13/2006-12-13-trunk-builds/#comment-4115</guid>
		<description>"so Firefox trunk now passes the test."

Wasn’t the nose off by one pixel? I believe that was part of the Acid2 test, too… At least Opera had such a displacement and they fixed it, see: http://weblog.timaltman.com/node/802

Not that I care :). I’m looking forward to using trunk builds!


~Grauw</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;so Firefox trunk now passes the test.&#8221;</p>
<p>Wasn’t the nose off by one pixel? I believe that was part of the Acid2 test, too… At least Opera had such a displacement and they fixed it, see: <a href="http://weblog.timaltman.com/node/802" rel="nofollow">http://weblog.timaltman.com/node/802</a></p>
<p>Not that I care :). I’m looking forward to using trunk builds!</p>
<p>~Grauw</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: J. McNair</title>
		<link>http://www.squarefree.com/burningedge/2006/12/13/2006-12-13-trunk-builds/#comment-4114</link>
		<dc:creator>J. McNair</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Dec 2006 03:20:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.squarefree.com/burningedge/2006/12/13/2006-12-13-trunk-builds/#comment-4114</guid>
		<description>Wow, Firefox 3 may officially be the Best Thing Ever(TM). More SVG features, Cairo on by default, Cocoa on Mac, XULRunner, and the ever-lovin' Reflow Branch. If they can keep (and improve on) the stability and speed, you're golden. Heck, I'd gladly accept a delay or two for all this.

Firefox 2 was already Surprisingly Good (though nothing revolutionary). Of course, it did come with the fix for my pet bug (Find in TEXTAREA) which allowed me to kick IE for good. Speedier and more stable than 1.5 even. Mind that I'm on a clean install with fresh profile. I imported bookmarks, etc. after the fact, but that's standard practice for new Firefox versions for me. I only crashed on abandoned extensions. They should make the "problematic extensions list" much more public, like a default bookmark.

Basically, thank you for this good blog, and thanks to your Mozilla colleagues for good products.

--JM</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow, Firefox 3 may officially be the Best Thing Ever(TM). More SVG features, Cairo on by default, Cocoa on Mac, XULRunner, and the ever-lovin&#8217; Reflow Branch. If they can keep (and improve on) the stability and speed, you&#8217;re golden. Heck, I&#8217;d gladly accept a delay or two for all this.</p>
<p>Firefox 2 was already Surprisingly Good (though nothing revolutionary). Of course, it did come with the fix for my pet bug (Find in TEXTAREA) which allowed me to kick IE for good. Speedier and more stable than 1.5 even. Mind that I&#8217;m on a clean install with fresh profile. I imported bookmarks, etc. after the fact, but that&#8217;s standard practice for new Firefox versions for me. I only crashed on abandoned extensions. They should make the &#8220;problematic extensions list&#8221; much more public, like a default bookmark.</p>
<p>Basically, thank you for this good blog, and thanks to your Mozilla colleagues for good products.</p>
<p>&#8211;JM</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
