<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 2006-08-17 Trunk builds</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.squarefree.com/burningedge/2006/08/18/2006-08-17-trunk-builds/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.squarefree.com/burningedge/2006/08/18/2006-08-17-trunk-builds/</link>
	<description>Developments in nightly builds of Mozilla Firefox</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2008 13:55:50 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: J. McNair</title>
		<link>http://www.squarefree.com/burningedge/2006/08/18/2006-08-17-trunk-builds/#comment-3757</link>
		<dc:creator>J. McNair</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Aug 2006 21:54:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.squarefree.com/burningedge/2006/08/18/2006-08-17-trunk-builds/#comment-3757</guid>
		<description>343129 sounds like it would be good for a 1.8.0.x as well as a 1.8.x just as a courtesy to Chinese speaking Firefox fans. Character sets and Unicode mappings are naturally very tricky, so I understand letting it "bake".

If (after testing) it is found to work without regressions, is there a way to ask to keep it from being put off until Fx3 or even Fx2? I mean, the mapping table is just that, a table of useful data for one specific implementation that doesn't affect anything else. There is little to no actual code and no changes to any subsystems. It's not like the Persian translation which depends on several major bugfixes (and thus warrants waiting for another release). 

Just asking, and thanks for updating.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>343129 sounds like it would be good for a 1.8.0.x as well as a 1.8.x just as a courtesy to Chinese speaking Firefox fans. Character sets and Unicode mappings are naturally very tricky, so I understand letting it &#8220;bake&#8221;.</p>
<p>If (after testing) it is found to work without regressions, is there a way to ask to keep it from being put off until Fx3 or even Fx2? I mean, the mapping table is just that, a table of useful data for one specific implementation that doesn&#8217;t affect anything else. There is little to no actual code and no changes to any subsystems. It&#8217;s not like the Persian translation which depends on several major bugfixes (and thus warrants waiting for another release). </p>
<p>Just asking, and thanks for updating.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
