<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 2006-05-17 Trunk builds</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.squarefree.com/burningedge/2006/05/17/2006-05-17-trunk-builds/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.squarefree.com/burningedge/2006/05/17/2006-05-17-trunk-builds/</link>
	<description>Developments in nightly builds of Mozilla Firefox</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 01:15:34 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Agagooga</title>
		<link>http://www.squarefree.com/burningedge/2006/05/17/2006-05-17-trunk-builds/#comment-3661</link>
		<dc:creator>Agagooga</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 May 2006 00:02:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.squarefree.com/burningedge/2006/05/17/2006-05-17-trunk-builds/#comment-3661</guid>
		<description>re: FAYT - Use Retro Find!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>re: FAYT - Use Retro Find!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: J. McNair</title>
		<link>http://www.squarefree.com/burningedge/2006/05/17/2006-05-17-trunk-builds/#comment-3659</link>
		<dc:creator>J. McNair</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 May 2006 03:30:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.squarefree.com/burningedge/2006/05/17/2006-05-17-trunk-builds/#comment-3659</guid>
		<description>Though this seems rather obvious, can we safely assume that session restore is going into Firefox 2.x (Branch 1.8.x) AND Firefox 3.x (Trunk 1.9.x)? I certainly hope so, as that alone might make it worthy of a full major version bump.

Would still like to see FAYT working in user input textareas....
Wish I were a good enough coder to figure out how to do it myself.

--JM</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Though this seems rather obvious, can we safely assume that session restore is going into Firefox 2.x (Branch 1.8.x) AND Firefox 3.x (Trunk 1.9.x)? I certainly hope so, as that alone might make it worthy of a full major version bump.</p>
<p>Would still like to see FAYT working in user input textareas&#8230;.<br />
Wish I were a good enough coder to figure out how to do it myself.</p>
<p>&#8211;JM</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ihar `Philips` Filipau</title>
		<link>http://www.squarefree.com/burningedge/2006/05/17/2006-05-17-trunk-builds/#comment-3658</link>
		<dc:creator>Ihar `Philips` Filipau</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 May 2006 12:13:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.squarefree.com/burningedge/2006/05/17/2006-05-17-trunk-builds/#comment-3658</guid>
		<description>It would be fun to have list with most popular bugs.
I mean like "Bug of the Week" and "Bug of the Month". With comments disabled.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It would be fun to have list with most popular bugs.<br />
I mean like &#8220;Bug of the Week&#8221; and &#8220;Bug of the Month&#8221;. With comments disabled.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: noa</title>
		<link>http://www.squarefree.com/burningedge/2006/05/17/2006-05-17-trunk-builds/#comment-3657</link>
		<dc:creator>noa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 May 2006 13:24:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.squarefree.com/burningedge/2006/05/17/2006-05-17-trunk-builds/#comment-3657</guid>
		<description>has anyone done benchmarks for before and after nsIThreadManager was implemented?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>has anyone done benchmarks for before and after nsIThreadManager was implemented?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
