Comments on: 2006-02-09 Trunk builds http://www.squarefree.com/burningedge/2006/02/09/2006-02-09-trunk-builds/ Developments in nightly builds of Mozilla Firefox Sat, 05 Jul 2008 10:53:17 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5 By: CooLynX http://www.squarefree.com/burningedge/2006/02/09/2006-02-09-trunk-builds/#comment-3308 CooLynX Sat, 11 Feb 2006 07:25:15 +0000 http://www.squarefree.com/burningedge/2006/02/09/2006-02-09-trunk-builds/#comment-3308 You should be aware that there are some issues when using two different builds the same time. I guess they use something from each other and behave strangely. You should be aware that there are some issues when using two different builds the same time. I guess they use something from each other and behave strangely.

]]> By: Jesse Ruderman http://www.squarefree.com/burningedge/2006/02/09/2006-02-09-trunk-builds/#comment-3307 Jesse Ruderman Fri, 10 Feb 2006 18:11:09 +0000 http://www.squarefree.com/burningedge/2006/02/09/2006-02-09-trunk-builds/#comment-3307 In older / branch builds without the -no-remote flag, you can use the MOZ_NO_REMOTE environment variable instead. (Either set it globally or in a batch file from which you run Firefox.) In older / branch builds without the -no-remote flag, you can use the MOZ_NO_REMOTE environment variable instead. (Either set it globally or in a batch file from which you run Firefox.)

]]> By: tester http://www.squarefree.com/burningedge/2006/02/09/2006-02-09-trunk-builds/#comment-3306 tester Fri, 10 Feb 2006 15:19:18 +0000 http://www.squarefree.com/burningedge/2006/02/09/2006-02-09-trunk-builds/#comment-3306 Holly shoot! Finally they are able to do an elementary math they were refusing to learn in primary school. On downloading speed I mean(I know other browsers, e.g. IE6 didn't have it either, but IE6 is 49+ months old right?). Ok - we are good good going going, we know how to do plus minus wow, so it's not 1355KB/s on my 2Mbit/s network anymore... Too bad we would have to wait whole one year(or more) for this version to become usable... Another thing: "This makes it easier to run two instances of Firefox at once (with different profiles). " wow, freaking awesome now I can have 2 Firefox processes running, so when one of them crashes it won't take all my 4*20(just an example) tabs open and I won't spend 30 minutes browsing history to reopen links... Any other simple way to have more Firefox.exe processes runing using current nightly branch builds? I don't need another profile, I just need separate process when I click link(IE had it since forever...). Holly shoot! Finally they are able to do an elementary math they were refusing to learn in primary school. On downloading speed I mean(I know other browsers, e.g. IE6 didn’t have it either, but IE6 is 49+ months old right?). Ok - we are good good going going, we know how to do plus minus wow, so it’s not 1355KB/s on my 2Mbit/s network anymore… Too bad we would have to wait whole one year(or more) for this version to become usable…

Another thing: “This makes it easier to run two instances of Firefox at once (with different profiles). ” wow, freaking awesome now I can have 2 Firefox processes running, so when one of them crashes it won’t take all my 4*20(just an example) tabs open and I won’t spend 30 minutes browsing history to reopen links…

Any other simple way to have more Firefox.exe processes runing using current nightly branch builds? I don’t need another profile, I just need separate process when I click link(IE had it since forever…).

]]> By: Alfred Kayser http://www.squarefree.com/burningedge/2006/02/09/2006-02-09-trunk-builds/#comment-3305 Alfred Kayser Fri, 10 Feb 2006 08:13:02 +0000 http://www.squarefree.com/burningedge/2006/02/09/2006-02-09-trunk-builds/#comment-3305 Actually, the download starts immediatly when you click on the link (or do a 'right-click, SaveAs'), so even if you are quick in deciding where to place it, it is most often (on my internal network) allready completly downloaded. Actually, the download starts immediatly when you click on the link (or do a ‘right-click, SaveAs’),
so even if you are quick in deciding where to place it, it is most often (on my internal network) allready completly downloaded.

]]> By: Xilon http://www.squarefree.com/burningedge/2006/02/09/2006-02-09-trunk-builds/#comment-3304 Xilon Fri, 10 Feb 2006 06:54:15 +0000 http://www.squarefree.com/burningedge/2006/02/09/2006-02-09-trunk-builds/#comment-3304 It has had that feature for quite some time (ever since I can remember). I was surprised when I found out about it. Very handy sometimes :) It has had that feature for quite some time (ever since I can remember). I was surprised when I found out about it. Very handy sometimes :)

]]> By: Ulysses http://www.squarefree.com/burningedge/2006/02/09/2006-02-09-trunk-builds/#comment-3303 Ulysses Thu, 09 Feb 2006 22:40:19 +0000 http://www.squarefree.com/burningedge/2006/02/09/2006-02-09-trunk-builds/#comment-3303 From the download manager bug: "... if you click on a link and spend a lot of time deciding where to save it, FF starts downloading it immediately ..." Firefox does this? I hadn't noticed. Thought only Opera had this feature ... From the download manager bug: “… if you click on a link and spend a lot of time deciding where to
save it, FF starts downloading it immediately …”

Firefox does this? I hadn’t noticed. Thought only Opera had this feature …

]]>