<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 2005-12-19 Trunk builds</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.squarefree.com/burningedge/2005/12/19/2005-12-19-trunk-builds/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.squarefree.com/burningedge/2005/12/19/2005-12-19-trunk-builds/</link>
	<description>Developments in nightly builds of Mozilla Firefox</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jul 2008 10:59:08 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: SuperMichael</title>
		<link>http://www.squarefree.com/burningedge/2005/12/19/2005-12-19-trunk-builds/#comment-3210</link>
		<dc:creator>SuperMichael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Dec 2005 09:05:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.squarefree.com/burningedge/2005/12/19/2005-12-19-trunk-builds/#comment-3210</guid>
		<description>I doubt we'll see a serious comment, just some marketing spin to avoid giving direct answers as I have seen with direct questions on the Firefox dev blogs wich was quite dissapointing but on the other hand they have to market their stuff so it understandable.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I doubt we&#8217;ll see a serious comment, just some marketing spin to avoid giving direct answers as I have seen with direct questions on the Firefox dev blogs wich was quite dissapointing but on the other hand they have to market their stuff so it understandable.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CooLynX</title>
		<link>http://www.squarefree.com/burningedge/2005/12/19/2005-12-19-trunk-builds/#comment-3194</link>
		<dc:creator>CooLynX</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Dec 2005 14:20:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.squarefree.com/burningedge/2005/12/19/2005-12-19-trunk-builds/#comment-3194</guid>
		<description>Sorry for offtopic, but here is what I warned about before 1.5 release.
http://www.informationweek.com/news/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=175007152
So finally we got bad PR in press, now lets see the response from the Firefox officials.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry for offtopic, but here is what I warned about before 1.5 release.<br />
<a href="http://www.informationweek.com/news/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=175007152" rel="nofollow">http://www.informationweek.com/news/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=175007152</a><br />
So finally we got bad PR in press, now lets see the response from the Firefox officials.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
