<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: RC3 is Firefox 1.5</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.squarefree.com/burningedge/2005/11/29/rc3-is-firefox-15/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.squarefree.com/burningedge/2005/11/29/rc3-is-firefox-15/</link>
	<description>Developments in nightly builds of Mozilla Firefox</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 02:17:06 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: nestastnik</title>
		<link>http://www.squarefree.com/burningedge/2005/11/29/rc3-is-firefox-15/#comment-3178</link>
		<dc:creator>nestastnik</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Dec 2005 18:24:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.squarefree.com/burningedge/?p=577#comment-3178</guid>
		<description>You can follow this blog links, so navigate to:
http://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla.org/firefox/nightly/?C=M;O=A

and choose what you want, the latest releases are at the bottom. If you want a branch build(the most stabile one), look for mozilla18:

http://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla.org/firefox/nightly/2005-12-10-04-mozilla1.8/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You can follow this blog links, so navigate to:<br />
<a href="http://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla.org/firefox/nightly/?C=M;O=A" rel="nofollow">http://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla.org/firefox/nightly/?C=M;O=A</a></p>
<p>and choose what you want, the latest releases are at the bottom. If you want a branch build(the most stabile one), look for mozilla18:</p>
<p><a href="http://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla.org/firefox/nightly/2005-12-10-04-mozilla1.8/" rel="nofollow">http://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla.org/firefox/nightly/2005-12-10-04-mozilla1.8/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nestastnik</title>
		<link>http://www.squarefree.com/burningedge/2005/11/29/rc3-is-firefox-15/#comment-3174</link>
		<dc:creator>nestastnik</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Dec 2005 19:57:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.squarefree.com/burningedge/?p=577#comment-3174</guid>
		<description>I knew about this vulnerability, been posted by Secunia a few days ago...

I doubt it concern me at all, as I said earlier I allways delete whole profile directory (except bookmarks.html) so with it goes history.dat, and I do it before every unpacking of .zip files, countles of times. And memmory problem was in many many releases. Beside it I can't be hacked ! I am a l33t useR lol :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I knew about this vulnerability, been posted by Secunia a few days ago&#8230;</p>
<p>I doubt it concern me at all, as I said earlier I allways delete whole profile directory (except bookmarks.html) so with it goes history.dat, and I do it before every unpacking of .zip files, countles of times. And memmory problem was in many many releases. Beside it I can&#8217;t be hacked ! I am a l33t useR lol :-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: peakshysteria</title>
		<link>http://www.squarefree.com/burningedge/2005/11/29/rc3-is-firefox-15/#comment-3171</link>
		<dc:creator>peakshysteria</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Dec 2005 06:27:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.squarefree.com/burningedge/?p=577#comment-3171</guid>
		<description>hey nestastnik; found something which maybe can be related to your memory problem: Successful exploitation causes the browser to consume a large amount of CPU and memory resources on a vulnerable system when the affected browser is started up again after an attack.

http://secunia.com/advisories/17934/ not sure if this is really related to your problem.........but then again maybe it is............especially since you never use extensions which would be the main reason for this problem as i see it.....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hey nestastnik; found something which maybe can be related to your memory problem: Successful exploitation causes the browser to consume a large amount of CPU and memory resources on a vulnerable system when the affected browser is started up again after an attack.</p>
<p><a href="http://secunia.com/advisories/17934/" rel="nofollow">http://secunia.com/advisories/17934/</a> not sure if this is really related to your problem&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;but then again maybe it is&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;especially since you never use extensions which would be the main reason for this problem as i see it&#8230;..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nestastnik</title>
		<link>http://www.squarefree.com/burningedge/2005/11/29/rc3-is-firefox-15/#comment-3125</link>
		<dc:creator>nestastnik</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Dec 2005 18:18:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.squarefree.com/burningedge/?p=577#comment-3125</guid>
		<description>just checked link provided by mooky, there isn't ANY change to FF branch, say win32 FF between today and 11.11.

If that listing lists ALL the bugfixes avaiable for now, it seems developers stopped fixing FF and emphasize on Camino release...

But even FF 1.5 RC3/Final has some bugs which could be fixed, I guess its not priority for now. But how can be win32 version binary different then? Like RC3 and todays, if no win32 specific bug / change has been added ?

all in all, FF is still the browser King, wish we get version 2.0 sooner, that will be a real kick!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>just checked link provided by mooky, there isn&#8217;t ANY change to FF branch, say win32 FF between today and 11.11.</p>
<p>If that listing lists ALL the bugfixes avaiable for now, it seems developers stopped fixing FF and emphasize on Camino release&#8230;</p>
<p>But even FF 1.5 RC3/Final has some bugs which could be fixed, I guess its not priority for now. But how can be win32 version binary different then? Like RC3 and todays, if no win32 specific bug / change has been added ?</p>
<p>all in all, FF is still the browser King, wish we get version 2.0 sooner, that will be a real kick!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nestastnik</title>
		<link>http://www.squarefree.com/burningedge/2005/11/29/rc3-is-firefox-15/#comment-3124</link>
		<dc:creator>nestastnik</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Dec 2005 17:58:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.squarefree.com/burningedge/?p=577#comment-3124</guid>
		<description>any reason to run 11.11 RC3 and not, say, 3.12 FF moz-1.8 branch? I don't like reverting back...in time :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>any reason to run 11.11 RC3 and not, say, 3.12 FF moz-1.8 branch? I don&#8217;t like reverting back&#8230;in time :-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Manoj</title>
		<link>http://www.squarefree.com/burningedge/2005/11/29/rc3-is-firefox-15/#comment-3121</link>
		<dc:creator>Manoj</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Dec 2005 00:49:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.squarefree.com/burningedge/?p=577#comment-3121</guid>
		<description>Sage worked magically after I restarted Firefox :) Sorry for the false positive.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sage worked magically after I restarted Firefox :) Sorry for the false positive.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
