Comments on: 2005-10-19 Branch builds http://www.squarefree.com/burningedge/2005/10/19/2005-10-19-branch-builds/ Developments in nightly builds of Mozilla Firefox Thu, 04 Dec 2008 02:24:45 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5 By: Moktoipas http://www.squarefree.com/burningedge/2005/10/19/2005-10-19-branch-builds/#comment-2920 Moktoipas Thu, 20 Oct 2005 23:01:18 +0000 http://www.squarefree.com/burningedge/2005/10/19/2005-10-19-branch-builds/#comment-2920 (if the table doesn't not resize on hover, try with another size of font) (if the table doesn’t not resize on hover, try with another size of font)

]]> By: Moktoipas http://www.squarefree.com/burningedge/2005/10/19/2005-10-19-branch-builds/#comment-2919 Moktoipas Thu, 20 Oct 2005 22:59:54 +0000 http://www.squarefree.com/burningedge/2005/10/19/2005-10-19-branch-builds/#comment-2919 http://www.moktoipas.com/bug.htm This is very strange (and doesn't work on FX 1.0.7 too) i think there a two bugs: -the a:hover resize de div width some CSS atributes (like -moz-opacity or border) -the -moz-opacity doesn't draw the image in the good place. http://www.moktoipas.com/bug.htm

This is very strange (and doesn’t work on FX 1.0.7 too)

i think there a two bugs:
-the a:hover resize de div width some CSS atributes (like -moz-opacity or border)
-the -moz-opacity doesn’t draw the image in the good place.

]]> By: Moktoipas http://www.squarefree.com/burningedge/2005/10/19/2005-10-19-branch-builds/#comment-2918 Moktoipas Thu, 20 Oct 2005 18:31:28 +0000 http://www.squarefree.com/burningedge/2005/10/19/2005-10-19-branch-builds/#comment-2918 Jesse Ruderman >> OK thanks ^^ Jesse Ruderman >> OK thanks ^^

]]> By: Jesse Ruderman http://www.squarefree.com/burningedge/2005/10/19/2005-10-19-branch-builds/#comment-2917 Jesse Ruderman Thu, 20 Oct 2005 18:12:07 +0000 http://www.squarefree.com/burningedge/2005/10/19/2005-10-19-branch-builds/#comment-2917 Anonymous, update.rdf will only be different from install.rdf if the extension author goes into AMO and changes it. Having maxVersion start at 1.5.0.* is correct most of the time and keeps authors from having to make changes for security releases, while making it possible to disable an extension in the rare event that a security release breaks an extension. Anonymous, update.rdf will only be different from install.rdf if the extension author goes into AMO and changes it. Having maxVersion start at 1.5.0.* is correct most of the time and keeps authors from having to make changes for security releases, while making it possible to disable an extension in the rare event that a security release breaks an extension.

]]> By: Anonymous http://www.squarefree.com/burningedge/2005/10/19/2005-10-19-branch-builds/#comment-2916 Anonymous Thu, 20 Oct 2005 10:59:59 +0000 http://www.squarefree.com/burningedge/2005/10/19/2005-10-19-branch-builds/#comment-2916 Wouldn't this feature cause the value in install.rdf to be irrelevant since EM would allways check update.rdf for the correct value? Wouldn’t this feature cause the value in install.rdf to be irrelevant since EM would allways check update.rdf for the correct value?

]]> By: Jesse Ruderman http://www.squarefree.com/burningedge/2005/10/19/2005-10-19-branch-builds/#comment-2915 Jesse Ruderman Thu, 20 Oct 2005 08:20:53 +0000 http://www.squarefree.com/burningedge/2005/10/19/2005-10-19-branch-builds/#comment-2915 Anonymous, I don't understand your question. Those features seem to complement each other well rather than being redundant with each other. Anonymous, I don’t understand your question. Those features seem to complement each other well rather than being redundant with each other.

]]>