<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Firefox 1.0.7 release candidates (?)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.squarefree.com/burningedge/2005/09/13/firefox-107-release-candidates/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.squarefree.com/burningedge/2005/09/13/firefox-107-release-candidates/</link>
	<description>Developments in nightly builds of Mozilla Firefox</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 03:30:11 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: MozillaZine 한국어 &#187; 모질라 파이어폭스 1.0.7과 모질라 1.7.12의 릴리스 후보판</title>
		<link>http://www.squarefree.com/burningedge/2005/09/13/firefox-107-release-candidates/#comment-2680</link>
		<dc:creator>MozillaZine 한국어 &#187; 모질라 파이어폭스 1.0.7과 모질라 1.7.12의 릴리스 후보판</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Sep 2005 05:18:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.squarefree.com/burningedge/?p=529#comment-2680</guid>
		<description>[...] The Burning Edge에 9월 13일자 파이어폭스 1.0.x 빌드의 수정 사항과 파이어폭스 1.0.7 릴리스 후보판의 수정 사항에 대한 글이 올라왔다. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] The Burning Edge에 9월 13일자 파이어폭스 1.0.x 빌드의 수정 사항과 파이어폭스 1.0.7 릴리스 후보판의 수정 사항에 대한 글이 올라왔다. [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Oliver</title>
		<link>http://www.squarefree.com/burningedge/2005/09/13/firefox-107-release-candidates/#comment-2648</link>
		<dc:creator>Oliver</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Sep 2005 21:48:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.squarefree.com/burningedge/?p=529#comment-2648</guid>
		<description>Is better to stay in 1.0.7 or 1.5b1? It seems that 1.5 will be done by end of 2005, right?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is better to stay in 1.0.7 or 1.5b1? It seems that 1.5 will be done by end of 2005, right?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jesse Ruderman</title>
		<link>http://www.squarefree.com/burningedge/2005/09/13/firefox-107-release-candidates/#comment-2645</link>
		<dc:creator>Jesse Ruderman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Sep 2005 08:43:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.squarefree.com/burningedge/?p=529#comment-2645</guid>
		<description>One isn't fixed on the trunk or Gecko 1.8 branch but is marked as blocking-1.8b5+.  The rest are fixed on both the trunk and the Gecko 1.8 branch.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One isn&#8217;t fixed on the trunk or Gecko 1.8 branch but is marked as blocking-1.8b5+.  The rest are fixed on both the trunk and the Gecko 1.8 branch.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jean-Marc Gillet</title>
		<link>http://www.squarefree.com/burningedge/2005/09/13/firefox-107-release-candidates/#comment-2644</link>
		<dc:creator>Jean-Marc Gillet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Sep 2005 08:08:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.squarefree.com/burningedge/?p=529#comment-2644</guid>
		<description>Were the security holes also fixed on the 1.5 branch ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Were the security holes also fixed on the 1.5 branch ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
