<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What&#8217;s new in Firefox 1.5 Beta 1</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.squarefree.com/burningedge/2005/09/02/whats-new-in-firefox-15-beta-1/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.squarefree.com/burningedge/2005/09/02/whats-new-in-firefox-15-beta-1/</link>
	<description>Developments in nightly builds of Mozilla Firefox</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 03:17:39 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Hank Roberts</title>
		<link>http://www.squarefree.com/burningedge/2005/09/02/whats-new-in-firefox-15-beta-1/#comment-2622</link>
		<dc:creator>Hank Roberts</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Sep 2005 14:11:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.squarefree.com/burningedge/2005/09/02/whats-new-in-firefox-15-beta-1/#comment-2622</guid>
		<description>Is the nightly "1.4" the beta for 1.5?
(In the official nightlies folder along with 1.0+)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is the nightly &#8220;1.4&#8243; the beta for 1.5?<br />
(In the official nightlies folder along with 1.0+)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Martin</title>
		<link>http://www.squarefree.com/burningedge/2005/09/02/whats-new-in-firefox-15-beta-1/#comment-2618</link>
		<dc:creator>Martin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Sep 2005 19:26:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.squarefree.com/burningedge/2005/09/02/whats-new-in-firefox-15-beta-1/#comment-2618</guid>
		<description>Any chance that also bug https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=288351 and very old one https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=63895 will be fixed in version 1.5?

Thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Any chance that also bug <a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=288351" rel="nofollow">https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=288351</a> and very old one <a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=63895" rel="nofollow">https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=63895</a> will be fixed in version 1.5?</p>
<p>Thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Lefevre</title>
		<link>http://www.squarefree.com/burningedge/2005/09/02/whats-new-in-firefox-15-beta-1/#comment-2614</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Lefevre</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Sep 2005 09:54:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.squarefree.com/burningedge/2005/09/02/whats-new-in-firefox-15-beta-1/#comment-2614</guid>
		<description>Looks good to me - thanks for doing this :)

Bug 260500 (favicon re-requested on every page) seems worthy of a mention, although it's not clear how/when it got fixed (as a Firefox site without a favicon, I would imagine you're in a good position to see the difference)

There's some discussion as to whether bug 271359 (bookmarks getting wrong favicons) is fixed or not (it's been reopened), I can't reproduce it any more, but I never could reproduce it reliably before. A fix was checked in for it though...

There's a couple of other notable bug fixes on bugs which are open (as in not security group only), but sort of security related - I guess you've left those out intentionally.

Presentational nit - some of the headings have initial caps on each word, some ("Notable bug fixes" in particular is at the same heading level) don't.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Looks good to me - thanks for doing this :)</p>
<p>Bug 260500 (favicon re-requested on every page) seems worthy of a mention, although it&#8217;s not clear how/when it got fixed (as a Firefox site without a favicon, I would imagine you&#8217;re in a good position to see the difference)</p>
<p>There&#8217;s some discussion as to whether bug 271359 (bookmarks getting wrong favicons) is fixed or not (it&#8217;s been reopened), I can&#8217;t reproduce it any more, but I never could reproduce it reliably before. A fix was checked in for it though&#8230;</p>
<p>There&#8217;s a couple of other notable bug fixes on bugs which are open (as in not security group only), but sort of security related - I guess you&#8217;ve left those out intentionally.</p>
<p>Presentational nit - some of the headings have initial caps on each word, some (&#8221;Notable bug fixes&#8221; in particular is at the same heading level) don&#8217;t.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jesse Ruderman</title>
		<link>http://www.squarefree.com/burningedge/2005/09/02/whats-new-in-firefox-15-beta-1/#comment-2613</link>
		<dc:creator>Jesse Ruderman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Sep 2005 08:05:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.squarefree.com/burningedge/2005/09/02/whats-new-in-firefox-15-beta-1/#comment-2613</guid>
		<description>Thanks MechR.  I fixed the typo and commented out the line for that bug.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks MechR.  I fixed the typo and commented out the line for that bug.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MechR</title>
		<link>http://www.squarefree.com/burningedge/2005/09/02/whats-new-in-firefox-15-beta-1/#comment-2612</link>
		<dc:creator>MechR</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Sep 2005 07:29:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.squarefree.com/burningedge/2005/09/02/whats-new-in-firefox-15-beta-1/#comment-2612</guid>
		<description>A minor thing, but you spelled September "Septmeber" on the first line ;)

Also, the fix for 303806 ([Windows] Make menus prettier on XP Luna) was backed out and awaits minor(?) fixes for padding.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A minor thing, but you spelled September &#8220;Septmeber&#8221; on the first line ;)</p>
<p>Also, the fix for 303806 ([Windows] Make menus prettier on XP Luna) was backed out and awaits minor(?) fixes for padding.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
