<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 2005-08-12 Trunk builds</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.squarefree.com/burningedge/2005/08/13/2005-08-12-trunk-builds/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.squarefree.com/burningedge/2005/08/13/2005-08-12-trunk-builds/</link>
	<description>Developments in nightly builds of Mozilla Firefox</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Sep 2010 21:08:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Simplex</title>
		<link>http://www.squarefree.com/burningedge/2005/08/13/2005-08-12-trunk-builds/comment-page-1/#comment-2491</link>
		<dc:creator>Simplex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Aug 2005 06:18:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.squarefree.com/burningedge/2005/08/13/2005-08-12-trunk-builds/#comment-2491</guid>
		<description>homebond:

Read the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.mozilla.org/projects/security/security-bugs-policy.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Mozilla security bug policy&lt;/a&gt;.

In short, the bug will go public about 2 weeks (?) after a they release a milestone with the fix included, or if the bug becomes public knowledge, usually by the Full Disclosure mailing list, or by another security website, whichever comes first.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>homebond:</p>
<p>Read the <a href="http://www.mozilla.org/projects/security/security-bugs-policy.html" rel="nofollow">Mozilla security bug policy</a>.</p>
<p>In short, the bug will go public about 2 weeks (?) after a they release a milestone with the fix included, or if the bug becomes public knowledge, usually by the Full Disclosure mailing list, or by another security website, whichever comes first.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DaF</title>
		<link>http://www.squarefree.com/burningedge/2005/08/13/2005-08-12-trunk-builds/comment-page-1/#comment-2489</link>
		<dc:creator>DaF</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Aug 2005 02:20:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.squarefree.com/burningedge/2005/08/13/2005-08-12-trunk-builds/#comment-2489</guid>
		<description>Does anyone who messed with the add bookmark dialog? I could strangle that moron, they just can&#039;t stop them selfs from screwing it up more and more...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Does anyone who messed with the add bookmark dialog? I could strangle that moron, they just can&#8217;t stop them selfs from screwing it up more and more&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hemebond</title>
		<link>http://www.squarefree.com/burningedge/2005/08/13/2005-08-12-trunk-builds/comment-page-1/#comment-2488</link>
		<dc:creator>hemebond</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Aug 2005 23:53:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.squarefree.com/burningedge/2005/08/13/2005-08-12-trunk-builds/#comment-2488</guid>
		<description>Why am I not authorised to access bug 303181? Why shouldn&#039;t I know the details of a security flaw in a browser I use?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why am I not authorised to access bug 303181? Why shouldn&#8217;t I know the details of a security flaw in a browser I use?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gideon</title>
		<link>http://www.squarefree.com/burningedge/2005/08/13/2005-08-12-trunk-builds/comment-page-1/#comment-2476</link>
		<dc:creator>Gideon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Aug 2005 12:28:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.squarefree.com/burningedge/2005/08/13/2005-08-12-trunk-builds/#comment-2476</guid>
		<description>Cool- Fixing 302885 (rich text) ought to bring some loud applause.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cool- Fixing 302885 (rich text) ought to bring some loud applause.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
