Comments on: 2004-11-12 Trunk builds http://www.squarefree.com/burningedge/2004/11/13/2004-11-12-trunk-builds/ Developments in nightly builds of Mozilla Firefox Thu, 07 Aug 2008 23:44:11 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5 By: Slyoldfox http://www.squarefree.com/burningedge/2004/11/13/2004-11-12-trunk-builds/#comment-1985 Slyoldfox Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000 http://www.squarefree.com/burningedge/?p=433#comment-1985 well the installer seemed to go smoothly, starting it gives me some errors tho. But it still works. I get some xpcom errors if i'm not mistaken well the installer seemed to go smoothly, starting it gives me some errors tho. But it still works. I get some xpcom errors if i’m not mistaken

]]> By: giandrea http://www.squarefree.com/burningedge/2004/11/13/2004-11-12-trunk-builds/#comment-1986 giandrea Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000 http://www.squarefree.com/burningedge/?p=433#comment-1986 This build is much faster with DHTML than Firefox 1.0, and I think it is generally faster in loading pages too. I tried a javascript benchmark (<a href="http://www.24fun.com/downloadcenter/benchjs/benchjs.html)">http://www.24fun.com/downloadcenter/benchjs/benchjs.html)</a> with Fx 1.0 and I got 53.68 seconds, then I tried it with this build and I got 39.64 seconds !!! (MacOS X, 800 MHz G4) This build is much faster with DHTML than Firefox 1.0, and I think it is generally faster in loading pages too. I tried a javascript benchmark (http://www.24fun.com/downloadcenter/benchjs/benchjs.html) with Fx 1.0 and I got 53.68 seconds, then I tried it with this build and I got 39.64 seconds !!! (MacOS X, 800 MHz G4)

]]> By: Pizbit http://www.squarefree.com/burningedge/2004/11/13/2004-11-12-trunk-builds/#comment-1987 Pizbit Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000 http://www.squarefree.com/burningedge/?p=433#comment-1987 1.0 release and I got 33.88 seconds:) 1.0 release and I got 33.88 seconds:)

]]> By: Slyoldfox http://www.squarefree.com/burningedge/2004/11/13/2004-11-12-trunk-builds/#comment-1988 Slyoldfox Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000 http://www.squarefree.com/burningedge/?p=433#comment-1988 Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.2; en-US; rv:1.7.5) Gecko/20041110 Firefox/1.0 noname, Firefox 1.x, Windows 2000 Server, 1.00-1.09GHz 20.07 seconds, Nov 14, at 06:06:56 ranking: 282 out of 502 testers Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.2; en-US; rv:1.7.5) Gecko/20041110 Firefox/1.0

noname, Firefox 1.x, Windows 2000 Server, 1.00-1.09GHz 20.07 seconds, Nov 14, at 06:06:56
ranking: 282 out of 502 testers

]]> By: kstahl http://www.squarefree.com/burningedge/2004/11/13/2004-11-12-trunk-builds/#comment-1989 kstahl Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000 http://www.squarefree.com/burningedge/?p=433#comment-1989 Firefox 1.0, Windows XP, 3 GHz 11.86 seconds Firefox 1.0, Windows XP, 3 GHz

11.86 seconds

]]> By: none http://www.squarefree.com/burningedge/2004/11/13/2004-11-12-trunk-builds/#comment-1990 none Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000 http://www.squarefree.com/burningedge/?p=433#comment-1990 Just fyi you need to A)make sure all javacript options are turn on and b) popups are enabled. Otherwise it doesn't work correctly. Unfortunately as much as I like firefox its still dog slow in many respects. my results PIII 7000 Firefox 1.0 78.36 IE 6.0 XP SP2 50.1 Next up I guess I'll try this new build to see if I can confirm the new builds speed. Just fyi you need to A)make sure all javacript options are turn on and b) popups are enabled. Otherwise it doesn’t work correctly.

Unfortunately as much as I like firefox its still dog slow in many respects.

my results PIII 7000
Firefox 1.0 78.36
IE 6.0 XP SP2 50.1

Next up I guess I’ll try this new build to see if I can confirm the new builds speed.

]]>