Comments on: 2004-10-26 Branch late builds http://www.squarefree.com/burningedge/2004/10/26/2004-10-26-branch-late-builds/ Developments in nightly builds of Mozilla Firefox Fri, 25 Jul 2008 16:37:53 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5 By: Anthony http://www.squarefree.com/burningedge/2004/10/26/2004-10-26-branch-late-builds/#comment-1846 Anthony Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000 http://www.squarefree.com/burningedge/?p=421#comment-1846 Looks like a 27th release date then?? Looks like a 27th release date then??

]]> By: ANBO Motohiko http://www.squarefree.com/burningedge/2004/10/26/2004-10-26-branch-late-builds/#comment-1847 ANBO Motohiko Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000 http://www.squarefree.com/burningedge/?p=421#comment-1847 'Help -> About Mozilla Firefox' says '0.11 RC1'. ‘Help -> About Mozilla Firefox’ says ‘0.11 RC1′.

]]> By: Jean-Marc Gillet http://www.squarefree.com/burningedge/2004/10/26/2004-10-26-branch-late-builds/#comment-1848 Jean-Marc Gillet Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000 http://www.squarefree.com/burningedge/?p=421#comment-1848 I have the impression that the developers are more and more tempted to fix some bugs with band-aids in order to meet *their* deadline, rather than correctly fixing them. I fear that they are setting some time bombs for Firefox 2.0 . I have the impression that the developers are more and more tempted to fix some bugs with band-aids in order to meet *their* deadline, rather than correctly fixing them. I fear that they are setting some time bombs for Firefox 2.0 .

]]> By: Jugalator http://www.squarefree.com/burningedge/2004/10/26/2004-10-26-branch-late-builds/#comment-1849 Jugalator Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000 http://www.squarefree.com/burningedge/?p=421#comment-1849 I have seen nothing to indicate this. Are you referring to anything in particular, or just a gut feeling? As for the help screen, that only means they checked in the change to the version number, not that it officially is that version. I have seen nothing to indicate this.

Are you referring to anything in particular, or just a gut feeling?

As for the help screen, that only means they checked in the change to the version number, not that it officially is that version.

]]> By: Timothy Lim http://www.squarefree.com/burningedge/2004/10/26/2004-10-26-branch-late-builds/#comment-1850 Timothy Lim Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000 http://www.squarefree.com/burningedge/?p=421#comment-1850 "I have the impression that the developers are more and more tempted to fix some bugs with band-aids in order to meet *their* deadline, rather than correctly fixing them. I fear that they are setting some time bombs for Firefox 2.0 ." i always thought that each major upgrade such as version 2 and above would be cut from trunk. i.e. the branch build that leads into 1.0 now would only be used for the development of 1.x builds. “I have the impression that the developers are more and more tempted to fix some bugs with band-aids in order to meet *their* deadline, rather than correctly fixing them. I fear that they are setting some time bombs for Firefox 2.0 .”

i always thought that each major upgrade such as version 2 and above would be cut from trunk. i.e. the branch build that leads into 1.0 now would only be used for the development of 1.x builds.

]]> By: Noa http://www.squarefree.com/burningedge/2004/10/26/2004-10-26-branch-late-builds/#comment-1851 Noa Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000 http://www.squarefree.com/burningedge/?p=421#comment-1851 I bet 263844 is a result of that security tab spoof checkin. I bet 263844 is a result of that security tab spoof checkin.

]]>