<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Firefox 1.0 Preview Release</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.squarefree.com/burningedge/2004/09/14/firefox-10-preview-release/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.squarefree.com/burningedge/2004/09/14/firefox-10-preview-release/</link>
	<description>Developments in nightly builds of Mozilla Firefox</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 12 Dec 2011 19:17:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rirath</title>
		<link>http://www.squarefree.com/burningedge/2004/09/14/firefox-10-preview-release/comment-page-1/#comment-1579</link>
		<dc:creator>Rirath</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.squarefree.com/burningedge/?p=394#comment-1579</guid>
		<description>Yatta! :)  Nice last minute switch with the popups too, that&#039;s been bugging me a bit from time to time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yatta! :)  Nice last minute switch with the popups too, that&#8217;s been bugging me a bit from time to time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jesse Ruderman</title>
		<link>http://www.squarefree.com/burningedge/2004/09/14/firefox-10-preview-release/comment-page-1/#comment-1580</link>
		<dc:creator>Jesse Ruderman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.squarefree.com/burningedge/?p=394#comment-1580</guid>
		<description>Eh.  I&#039;m not happy with that change.  It removes most of the anti-spoofing benefit (since the status bar doesn&#039;t tell you what site you&#039;re on) and only gives web app windows a few more pixels.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Eh.  I&#8217;m not happy with that change.  It removes most of the anti-spoofing benefit (since the status bar doesn&#8217;t tell you what site you&#8217;re on) and only gives web app windows a few more pixels.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Trumbour</title>
		<link>http://www.squarefree.com/burningedge/2004/09/14/firefox-10-preview-release/comment-page-1/#comment-1581</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Trumbour</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.squarefree.com/burningedge/?p=394#comment-1581</guid>
		<description>&quot;Fixed: 259192 - In pop-ups, always show status bar instead of always showing address bar.&quot;
A better move would be to make this an option, with choices &quot;Show only status bar&quot;, &quot;Show only Address bar&quot;, &quot;Show both&quot;, and &quot;Show none&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Fixed: 259192 &#8211; In pop-ups, always show status bar instead of always showing address bar.&#8221;<br />
A better move would be to make this an option, with choices &#8220;Show only status bar&#8221;, &#8220;Show only Address bar&#8221;, &#8220;Show both&#8221;, and &#8220;Show none&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jugalator</title>
		<link>http://www.squarefree.com/burningedge/2004/09/14/firefox-10-preview-release/comment-page-1/#comment-1582</link>
		<dc:creator>Jugalator</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.squarefree.com/burningedge/?p=394#comment-1582</guid>
		<description>Hmm, I&#039;m not sure about that -- is there a good reason for the user to select? If not, it will just clutter the interface. The point is after all to have a good solution for security, and I don&#039;t think the user should be able to easily disable that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmm, I&#8217;m not sure about that &#8212; is there a good reason for the user to select? If not, it will just clutter the interface. The point is after all to have a good solution for security, and I don&#8217;t think the user should be able to easily disable that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: theefool</title>
		<link>http://www.squarefree.com/burningedge/2004/09/14/firefox-10-preview-release/comment-page-1/#comment-1583</link>
		<dc:creator>theefool</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.squarefree.com/burningedge/?p=394#comment-1583</guid>
		<description>I also liked the address bar showing up in pop-ups.  So, why not have both?  Status bar and address bar.  Make it a hidden setting or something.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I also liked the address bar showing up in pop-ups.  So, why not have both?  Status bar and address bar.  Make it a hidden setting or something.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: laszlo</title>
		<link>http://www.squarefree.com/burningedge/2004/09/14/firefox-10-preview-release/comment-page-1/#comment-1584</link>
		<dc:creator>laszlo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.squarefree.com/burningedge/?p=394#comment-1584</guid>
		<description>It already *is* a &quot;hidden setting&quot;, and it always was. Look at all the dom.disable_window_open_feature.* prefs in about:config. The resolutions of these bugs weren&#039;t more than changes in the defaults of these settings.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It already *is* a &#8220;hidden setting&#8221;, and it always was. Look at all the dom.disable_window_open_feature.* prefs in about:config. The resolutions of these bugs weren&#8217;t more than changes in the defaults of these settings.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

