Comments on: 2004-08-23 Branch builds http://www.squarefree.com/burningedge/2004/08/23/2004-08-23-branch-builds/ Developments in nightly builds of Mozilla Firefox Sat, 05 Jul 2008 08:35:09 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5 By: Snow http://www.squarefree.com/burningedge/2004/08/23/2004-08-23-branch-builds/#comment-1434 Snow Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000 http://www.squarefree.com/burningedge/?p=381#comment-1434 does the plugin manager work on this one?? does the plugin manager work on this one??

]]> By: cycomiko http://www.squarefree.com/burningedge/2004/08/23/2004-08-23-branch-builds/#comment-1435 cycomiko Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000 http://www.squarefree.com/burningedge/?p=381#comment-1435 why remove the offline feature? i remember when it was first an extension, then it was integrated and now its being removed again? why? why remove the offline feature? i remember when it was first an extension, then it was integrated and now its being removed again? why?

]]> By: cycomiko http://www.squarefree.com/burningedge/2004/08/23/2004-08-23-branch-builds/#comment-1436 cycomiko Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000 http://www.squarefree.com/burningedge/?p=381#comment-1436 why remove the offline feature? i remember when it was first an extension, then it was integrated and now its being removed again? why? why remove the offline feature? i remember when it was first an extension, then it was integrated and now its being removed again? why?

]]> By: Hugo http://www.squarefree.com/burningedge/2004/08/23/2004-08-23-branch-builds/#comment-1437 Hugo Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000 http://www.squarefree.com/burningedge/?p=381#comment-1437 Reason (from bug description): Our offline support is mostly broken and we don't have time to do proper testing before one dot oh. We should remove this for the PR. Reason (from bug description): Our offline support is mostly broken and we don’t have time to do proper testing before one dot oh. We should remove this for the PR.

]]> By: JP http://www.squarefree.com/burningedge/2004/08/23/2004-08-23-branch-builds/#comment-1438 JP Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000 http://www.squarefree.com/burningedge/?p=381#comment-1438 NO. NO.

]]> By: C. Coimbra http://www.squarefree.com/burningedge/2004/08/23/2004-08-23-branch-builds/#comment-1439 C. Coimbra Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000 http://www.squarefree.com/burningedge/?p=381#comment-1439 Re: Removal of Off-line I'm only a "user", but whenever I've used off-line it's WFM. Still, I defer to those who program the thing as to whether it's broken or not. However, the decision to remove it appears to me to be too Microsoftian for my taste, in that it's based on the date for release of 1.0 Is the date cast in stone? Why not find the time to fix the feature and release 1.0 once that's done? Lots of people work offline. So a pseudo-marketing decision that would see 1.0 released on a certain date w/out offline will lose acceptance by some. Myself, I'm sticking with the earlier Branch releases which still have the 'broken' off-line. Re: Removal of Off-line

I’m only a “user”, but whenever I’ve used off-line it’s WFM. Still, I defer to those who program the thing as to whether it’s broken or not.

However, the decision to remove it appears to me to be too Microsoftian for my taste, in that it’s based on the date for release of 1.0

Is the date cast in stone? Why not find the time to fix the feature and release 1.0 once that’s done?

Lots of people work offline. So a pseudo-marketing decision that would see 1.0 released on a certain date w/out offline will lose acceptance by some.

Myself, I’m sticking with the earlier Branch releases which still have the ‘broken’ off-line.

]]>