<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Trunk vs. branch</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.squarefree.com/burningedge/2004/07/07/trunk-vs-branch/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.squarefree.com/burningedge/2004/07/07/trunk-vs-branch/</link>
	<description>Developments in nightly builds of Mozilla Firefox</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Jul 2010 02:42:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thomas Kaschwig</title>
		<link>http://www.squarefree.com/burningedge/2004/07/07/trunk-vs-branch/comment-page-1/#comment-1172</link>
		<dc:creator>Thomas Kaschwig</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.squarefree.com/burningedge/?p=342#comment-1172</guid>
		<description>&gt; Will become Firefox 2.0 in the future.

Will Firefox 1.x never return to the trunk? I thought, that the aviary branch was only created for Firefox release 0.9-1.0.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>> Will become Firefox 2.0 in the future.</p>
<p>Will Firefox 1.x never return to the trunk? I thought, that the aviary branch was only created for Firefox release 0.9-1.0.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dennis Spaag</title>
		<link>http://www.squarefree.com/burningedge/2004/07/07/trunk-vs-branch/comment-page-1/#comment-1173</link>
		<dc:creator>Dennis Spaag</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.squarefree.com/burningedge/?p=342#comment-1173</guid>
		<description>I am more interested in the 1.0 release track.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am more interested in the 1.0 release track.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: amake</title>
		<link>http://www.squarefree.com/burningedge/2004/07/07/trunk-vs-branch/comment-page-1/#comment-1174</link>
		<dc:creator>amake</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.squarefree.com/burningedge/?p=342#comment-1174</guid>
		<description>How about you track the branch until 1.0, and then see where the major action is at that point?  If there are outstanding bugs and a quick maintenance release (1.0.1 or something) is indicated, then keep following it.  Otherwise, consider switching back to the trunk.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How about you track the branch until 1.0, and then see where the major action is at that point?  If there are outstanding bugs and a quick maintenance release (1.0.1 or something) is indicated, then keep following it.  Otherwise, consider switching back to the trunk.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steffen Wilberg</title>
		<link>http://www.squarefree.com/burningedge/2004/07/07/trunk-vs-branch/comment-page-1/#comment-1175</link>
		<dc:creator>Steffen Wilberg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.squarefree.com/burningedge/?p=342#comment-1175</guid>
		<description>All the action is in the branch. New features, new regressions, new crashes, yay!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>All the action is in the branch. New features, new regressions, new crashes, yay!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Forest</title>
		<link>http://www.squarefree.com/burningedge/2004/07/07/trunk-vs-branch/comment-page-1/#comment-1176</link>
		<dc:creator>Forest</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.squarefree.com/burningedge/?p=342#comment-1176</guid>
		<description>Agreed; I think the Burning Edge summaries are more useful to end users than to developers, and end users will be more interested in the branch that will become the next release.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Agreed; I think the Burning Edge summaries are more useful to end users than to developers, and end users will be more interested in the branch that will become the next release.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jesse Ruderman</title>
		<link>http://www.squarefree.com/burningedge/2004/07/07/trunk-vs-branch/comment-page-1/#comment-1177</link>
		<dc:creator>Jesse Ruderman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.squarefree.com/burningedge/?p=342#comment-1177</guid>
		<description>Blake Ross (a Firefox developer) reads The Burning Edge and says it would be more useful to him if it followed the branch.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Blake Ross (a Firefox developer) reads The Burning Edge and says it would be more useful to him if it followed the branch.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
