<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 2004-05-23 Trunk builds</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.squarefree.com/burningedge/2004/05/23/2004-05-23-trunk-builds/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.squarefree.com/burningedge/2004/05/23/2004-05-23-trunk-builds/</link>
	<description>Developments in nightly builds of Mozilla Firefox</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 12:44:10 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jean-Marc Gillet</title>
		<link>http://www.squarefree.com/burningedge/2004/05/23/2004-05-23-trunk-builds/#comment-957</link>
		<dc:creator>Jean-Marc Gillet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.squarefree.com/burningedge/?p=312#comment-957</guid>
		<description>Jesse, do you think you can spare a bit more of your time to have branch notes as well, given that the official 0.9 branch builds are now out ? (he said, expecting the answer "yes")
[Forgive me if I go too far here. I don't forget you've less time than before for TBE.]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jesse, do you think you can spare a bit more of your time to have branch notes as well, given that the official 0.9 branch builds are now out ? (he said, expecting the answer &#8220;yes&#8221;)<br />
[Forgive me if I go too far here. I don&#8217;t forget you&#8217;ve less time than before for TBE.]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tim</title>
		<link>http://www.squarefree.com/burningedge/2004/05/23/2004-05-23-trunk-builds/#comment-958</link>
		<dc:creator>tim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.squarefree.com/burningedge/?p=312#comment-958</guid>
		<description>If not, with considerations for your time, it might be better to do just the Branch builds.  It might help move things to a better and sooner .9 and then 1 release.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If not, with considerations for your time, it might be better to do just the Branch builds.  It might help move things to a better and sooner .9 and then 1 release.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fishbert</title>
		<link>http://www.squarefree.com/burningedge/2004/05/23/2004-05-23-trunk-builds/#comment-959</link>
		<dc:creator>fishbert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.squarefree.com/burningedge/?p=312#comment-959</guid>
		<description>Oh, please stick with the nightly trunk builds.  If the site starts jumping back-and-forth between trunk and branch, people are just going to get confused as to which is which.  And, if people really want to know what's happened to the branch from day-to-day, Peter(6) does a nice summary of both trunk and branch changes over in the mozillazine forums.  I'd say leave him to do the once-every-couple-months branch cycles, and leave this site to do the ever-present trunks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, please stick with the nightly trunk builds.  If the site starts jumping back-and-forth between trunk and branch, people are just going to get confused as to which is which.  And, if people really want to know what&#8217;s happened to the branch from day-to-day, Peter(6) does a nice summary of both trunk and branch changes over in the mozillazine forums.  I&#8217;d say leave him to do the once-every-couple-months branch cycles, and leave this site to do the ever-present trunks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: José Jeria</title>
		<link>http://www.squarefree.com/burningedge/2004/05/23/2004-05-23-trunk-builds/#comment-960</link>
		<dc:creator>José Jeria</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.squarefree.com/burningedge/?p=312#comment-960</guid>
		<description>Mozilla crashes for me every time (also with a fresh profile) I visit a website that shows a movie (gamespot.com) with WMP9 and then close the browser... (it crashes when i quit the browser, movie is fine)

Anybody else seing this? I am on Windows 2000.

Also, are they any talkbalks for Windows?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mozilla crashes for me every time (also with a fresh profile) I visit a website that shows a movie (gamespot.com) with WMP9 and then close the browser&#8230; (it crashes when i quit the browser, movie is fine)</p>
<p>Anybody else seing this? I am on Windows 2000.</p>
<p>Also, are they any talkbalks for Windows?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: José Jeria</title>
		<link>http://www.squarefree.com/burningedge/2004/05/23/2004-05-23-trunk-builds/#comment-961</link>
		<dc:creator>José Jeria</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.squarefree.com/burningedge/?p=312#comment-961</guid>
		<description>Testcase:
&lt;a href="http://gui.muc.domeus.com/test/crash.html"&gt;http://gui.muc.domeus.com/test/crash.html&lt;/a&gt;

Visit the url, let the page load, you will see the WMP9 start (no movie will be shown). Now close the browser --&gt; Crash.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Testcase:<br />
<a href="http://gui.muc.domeus.com/test/crash.html">http://gui.muc.domeus.com/test/crash.html</a></p>
<p>Visit the url, let the page load, you will see the WMP9 start (no movie will be shown). Now close the browser &#8211;> Crash.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: johnleemk</title>
		<link>http://www.squarefree.com/burningedge/2004/05/23/2004-05-23-trunk-builds/#comment-962</link>
		<dc:creator>johnleemk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.squarefree.com/burningedge/?p=312#comment-962</guid>
		<description>This branch isn't just any branch - this branch is also leading to 1.0, which is dramatically important. The trunk is for 1.1 and beyond. Perhaps Jesse should cover the AVIARY branch until it finishes off at 1.0, and return to the trank for post-1.0 releases (which will be based off the trunk anyway).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This branch isn&#8217;t just any branch - this branch is also leading to 1.0, which is dramatically important. The trunk is for 1.1 and beyond. Perhaps Jesse should cover the AVIARY branch until it finishes off at 1.0, and return to the trank for post-1.0 releases (which will be based off the trunk anyway).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
