Comments on: Protesting for gay marriage http://www.squarefree.com/2008/11/17/protest/ Jesse Ruderman on Firefox, security, and more Fri, 09 Sep 2011 05:56:55 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: setukh http://www.squarefree.com/2008/11/17/protest/comment-page-1/#comment-4271 setukh Mon, 15 Dec 2008 21:24:19 +0000 http://www.squarefree.com/?p=406#comment-4271 "drew parallels to civil rights movements" having darker skin is not an evolutionary dead end "What [faggots] God hath joined together" specious http://flickr.com/photos/24637516@N05/3037236414/sizes/l/in/set-72157609220102364/ crux of the failure "Not your sacrament, just our civil right" then call the action something OTHER than marriage having a different definition. "Separate! Church and state!" Assuming for the sake of argument that "separation of church and state" does not conflict with the essence of the Constitution: Then why protest the state to inflict a minority opinion upon the majority values? "What do we want? [to be more] Equal [than everyone else]!" Not going to happen: not possible... much like the oxymoron of gay "marriage". “drew parallels to civil rights movements”

having darker skin is not an evolutionary dead end

“What [faggots] God hath joined together”

specious

http://flickr.com/photos/24637516@N05/3037236414/sizes/l/in/set-72157609220102364/

crux of the failure

“Not your sacrament, just our civil right”

then call the action something OTHER than marriage having a different definition.

“Separate! Church and state!”

Assuming for the sake of argument that “separation of church and state” does not conflict with the essence of the Constitution: Then why protest the state to inflict a minority opinion upon the majority values?

“What do we want? [to be more] Equal [than everyone else]!”

Not going to happen: not possible… much like the oxymoron of gay “marriage”.

]]>