<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Firefox to use Fibonacci version numbers</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.squarefree.com/2006/08/09/firefox-to-use-fibonacci-version-numbers/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.squarefree.com/2006/08/09/firefox-to-use-fibonacci-version-numbers/</link>
	<description>Jesse Ruderman on Firefox, security, and more</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2008 16:40:21 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Shawn Wilsher</title>
		<link>http://www.squarefree.com/2006/08/09/firefox-to-use-fibonacci-version-numbers/#comment-2373</link>
		<dc:creator>Shawn Wilsher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Aug 2006 14:57:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.squarefree.com/2006/08/09/firefox-to-use-fibonacci-version-numbers/#comment-2373</guid>
		<description>I find it funny that people are taking this seriously :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I find it funny that people are taking this seriously :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SantosJ</title>
		<link>http://www.squarefree.com/2006/08/09/firefox-to-use-fibonacci-version-numbers/#comment-2372</link>
		<dc:creator>SantosJ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Aug 2006 17:54:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.squarefree.com/2006/08/09/firefox-to-use-fibonacci-version-numbers/#comment-2372</guid>
		<description>@tom well, you could represent 1.5 as 1 by rounding down, when you would normally round up.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@tom well, you could represent 1.5 as 1 by rounding down, when you would normally round up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tom</title>
		<link>http://www.squarefree.com/2006/08/09/firefox-to-use-fibonacci-version-numbers/#comment-2371</link>
		<dc:creator>tom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Aug 2006 11:36:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.squarefree.com/2006/08/09/firefox-to-use-fibonacci-version-numbers/#comment-2371</guid>
		<description>Hey, we could always try surds.

Firefox Sqrt(7). Is that better than Firefox 3 pi / 2 ?
On second thoughts, that’s irrational. ;) 

Didn't laugh untill that coment, but are you sure that 1 then 1.5 then 2 then 3 is oart of fibinati sequence, or are you ignoring 1.5</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey, we could always try surds.</p>
<p>Firefox Sqrt(7). Is that better than Firefox 3 pi / 2 ?<br />
On second thoughts, that’s irrational. ;) </p>
<p>Didn&#8217;t laugh untill that coment, but are you sure that 1 then 1.5 then 2 then 3 is oart of fibinati sequence, or are you ignoring 1.5</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Something about Nothing</title>
		<link>http://www.squarefree.com/2006/08/09/firefox-to-use-fibonacci-version-numbers/#comment-2370</link>
		<dc:creator>Something about Nothing</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Aug 2006 11:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.squarefree.com/2006/08/09/firefox-to-use-fibonacci-version-numbers/#comment-2370</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Firefox to use Fibonacci version numbers!!...&lt;/strong&gt;

Are you kidding me?? I really really hope this is a just a hoax even though Jesse is someone who is very active in Mozilla activity and most probably he is right on in this post.
I personally feel that this is a really brain dead idea....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Firefox to use Fibonacci version numbers!!&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Are you kidding me?? I really really hope this is a just a hoax even though Jesse is someone who is very active in Mozilla activity and most probably he is right on in this post.<br />
I personally feel that this is a really brain dead idea&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave</title>
		<link>http://www.squarefree.com/2006/08/09/firefox-to-use-fibonacci-version-numbers/#comment-2369</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Aug 2006 09:41:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.squarefree.com/2006/08/09/firefox-to-use-fibonacci-version-numbers/#comment-2369</guid>
		<description>Hey, we could always try surds.

Firefox Sqrt(7). Is that better than Firefox 3 pi / 2 ?
On second thoughts, that's irrational. ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey, we could always try surds.</p>
<p>Firefox Sqrt(7). Is that better than Firefox 3 pi / 2 ?<br />
On second thoughts, that&#8217;s irrational. ;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel Glazman</title>
		<link>http://www.squarefree.com/2006/08/09/firefox-to-use-fibonacci-version-numbers/#comment-2368</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel Glazman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Aug 2006 14:26:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.squarefree.com/2006/08/09/firefox-to-use-fibonacci-version-numbers/#comment-2368</guid>
		<description>ROFL!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ROFL!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
