<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Security holes in Google Desktop Search fixed</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.squarefree.com/2005/07/17/security-holes-in-google-desktop-search/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.squarefree.com/2005/07/17/security-holes-in-google-desktop-search/</link>
	<description>Jesse Ruderman on Firefox, security, and more</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Aug 2010 01:47:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jesse Ruderman</title>
		<link>http://www.squarefree.com/2005/07/17/security-holes-in-google-desktop-search/comment-page-1/#comment-1473</link>
		<dc:creator>Jesse Ruderman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jul 2005 10:25:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.squarefree.com/2005/05/05/security-holes-in-google-desktop-search/#comment-1473</guid>
		<description>It hasn&#039;t been fixed, but David Baron has been working on it on and off.  See https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=147777.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It hasn&#8217;t been fixed, but David Baron has been working on it on and off.  See <a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=147777" rel="nofollow">https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=147777</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Felipe Gomes</title>
		<link>http://www.squarefree.com/2005/07/17/security-holes-in-google-desktop-search/comment-page-1/#comment-1469</link>
		<dc:creator>Felipe Gomes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jul 2005 06:53:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.squarefree.com/2005/05/05/security-holes-in-google-desktop-search/#comment-1469</guid>
		<description>Jesse. what was the solution for bug 57351? It seems like a hard problem to solve..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jesse. what was the solution for bug 57351? It seems like a hard problem to solve..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam</title>
		<link>http://www.squarefree.com/2005/07/17/security-holes-in-google-desktop-search/comment-page-1/#comment-1467</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jul 2005 01:48:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.squarefree.com/2005/05/05/security-holes-in-google-desktop-search/#comment-1467</guid>
		<description>You don&#039;t need a hosts file like that if you have Adblock</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You don&#8217;t need a hosts file like that if you have Adblock</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David 'Zanchey' Adam</title>
		<link>http://www.squarefree.com/2005/07/17/security-holes-in-google-desktop-search/comment-page-1/#comment-1456</link>
		<dc:creator>David 'Zanchey' Adam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jul 2005 13:39:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.squarefree.com/2005/05/05/security-holes-in-google-desktop-search/#comment-1456</guid>
		<description>Jesse -

&quot;Firefox, Windows XP, the Windows XP firewall, or my ISP could prevent &quot;external&quot; DNS names from resolving to &quot;internal&quot; IP addresses.like 127.0.0.1.&quot;

If Firefox and Windows XP did this (and possibly the firewall), you&#039;d break those wonderful hosts files filled with ad-server to 127.0.0.1 mappings (misguided though they might be).

I think the first suggestion, GDS rejecting requests that don&#039;t have a host header of localhost or 127.0.0.1, is the better one.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jesse -</p>
<p>&#8220;Firefox, Windows XP, the Windows XP firewall, or my ISP could prevent &#8220;external&#8221; DNS names from resolving to &#8220;internal&#8221; IP addresses.like 127.0.0.1.&#8221;</p>
<p>If Firefox and Windows XP did this (and possibly the firewall), you&#8217;d break those wonderful hosts files filled with ad-server to 127.0.0.1 mappings (misguided though they might be).</p>
<p>I think the first suggestion, GDS rejecting requests that don&#8217;t have a host header of localhost or 127.0.0.1, is the better one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Larry Page</title>
		<link>http://www.squarefree.com/2005/07/17/security-holes-in-google-desktop-search/comment-page-1/#comment-1455</link>
		<dc:creator>Larry Page</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jul 2005 10:53:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.squarefree.com/2005/05/05/security-holes-in-google-desktop-search/#comment-1455</guid>
		<description>Just what was the objective behind this post? So you could claim some credit?

Happy Ego Trip!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just what was the objective behind this post? So you could claim some credit?</p>
<p>Happy Ego Trip!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
