Comments on: What should be fixed in Firebird 0.8 http://www.squarefree.com/2004/01/10/what-should-be-fixed-in-firebird-08/ Jesse Ruderman on Firefox, security, and more Fri, 09 Sep 2011 05:56:55 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: alanjstr http://www.squarefree.com/2004/01/10/what-should-be-fixed-in-firebird-08/comment-page-1/#comment-207 alanjstr Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000 http://www.squarefree.com/test/wp15/wordpress/?p=87#comment-207 I haven't decided on the skinVer. Part of the problem is that there is a pending change to help simplify the process. Yes, "Safe Upgrade" is a very bad name. I haven’t decided on the skinVer. Part of the problem is that there is a pending change to help simplify the process.

Yes, “Safe Upgrade” is a very bad name.

]]> By: Boris http://www.squarefree.com/2004/01/10/what-should-be-fixed-in-firebird-08/comment-page-1/#comment-208 Boris Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000 http://www.squarefree.com/test/wp15/wordpress/?p=87#comment-208 You mean you don't agree that the list of "this bug is a regression due to code Firebird forked that didn't get updated to core api changes and has a patch" bugs really ought to get a good look for 0.8? You mean you don’t agree that the list of “this bug is a regression due to code Firebird forked that didn’t get updated to core api changes and has a patch” bugs really ought to get a good look for 0.8?

]]> By: Jesse Ruderman http://www.squarefree.com/2004/01/10/what-should-be-fixed-in-firebird-08/comment-page-1/#comment-209 Jesse Ruderman Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000 http://www.squarefree.com/test/wp15/wordpress/?p=87#comment-209 Which ones were those? Which ones were those?

]]> By: michaell http://www.squarefree.com/2004/01/10/what-should-be-fixed-in-firebird-08/comment-page-1/#comment-210 michaell Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000 http://www.squarefree.com/test/wp15/wordpress/?p=87#comment-210 commenting on ancient entry - Boris is (I guess) referring to the other bugs on Alan's list which you didn't agree with - regressions like bug 221899. These are regressions since 0.7 caused by Gecko changes - all that's needed is to apply the Seamonkey changes to the forked Firebird versions of the files. Obviously not going to happen though... commenting on ancient entry -

Boris is (I guess) referring to the other bugs on Alan’s list which you didn’t agree with – regressions like bug 221899. These are regressions since 0.7 caused by Gecko changes – all that’s needed is to apply the Seamonkey changes to the forked Firebird versions of the files.

Obviously not going to happen though…

]]>