<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google Cache and slow CSS</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.squarefree.com/2003/10/29/google-cache-and-slow-css/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.squarefree.com/2003/10/29/google-cache-and-slow-css/</link>
	<description>Jesse Ruderman on Firefox, security, and more</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 02 Mar 2012 12:46:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: alanjstr</title>
		<link>http://www.squarefree.com/2003/10/29/google-cache-and-slow-css/comment-page-1/#comment-161</link>
		<dc:creator>alanjstr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.squarefree.com/test/wp15/wordpress/?p=60#comment-161</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Completely unrelated to today&#039;s post:  Have you considered changing your RSS feed to 2.0?

It would solve your Category problem, I think.

&lt;a href=&quot;http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss#ltcategorygtSubelementOfLtitemgt&quot;&gt;http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss#ltcategorygtSubelementOfLtitemgt&lt;/a&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Completely unrelated to today&#8217;s post:  Have you considered changing your RSS feed to 2.0?</p>
<p>It would solve your Category problem, I think.</p>
<p><a href="http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss#ltcategorygtSubelementOfLtitemgt">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss#ltcategorygtSubelementOfLtitemgt</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jesse Ruderman</title>
		<link>http://www.squarefree.com/2003/10/29/google-cache-and-slow-css/comment-page-1/#comment-162</link>
		<dc:creator>Jesse Ruderman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.squarefree.com/test/wp15/wordpress/?p=60#comment-162</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Google Cache pages have a link:

&quot;This cached page may reference images which are no longer available. Click here for the cached text only.&quot;

Clicking that link strips stylesheets in addition to images, so it is a good workaround for Mozilla users who figure out that they should cilck the link.  IE has poorer incremental rendering, so IE users can&#039;t even see that link until the stylesheet load times out.

Opera 7.54 seems to avoid this problem entirely -- I can see a cached page in Opera in about 1 second that I can&#039;t see in Mozilla or Internet Explorer for about half a minute.  I wonder if it takes an approach like &lt;a href=&quot;http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=84582#c11&quot;&gt;http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=84582#c11&lt;/a&gt; or does something else.
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Google Cache pages have a link:</p>
<p>&#8220;This cached page may reference images which are no longer available. Click here for the cached text only.&#8221;</p>
<p>Clicking that link strips stylesheets in addition to images, so it is a good workaround for Mozilla users who figure out that they should cilck the link.  IE has poorer incremental rendering, so IE users can&#8217;t even see that link until the stylesheet load times out.</p>
<p>Opera 7.54 seems to avoid this problem entirely &#8212; I can see a cached page in Opera in about 1 second that I can&#8217;t see in Mozilla or Internet Explorer for about half a minute.  I wonder if it takes an approach like <a href="http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=84582#c11">http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=84582#c11</a> or does something else.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
