<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google Cache and slow CSS</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.squarefree.com/2003/10/29/google-cache-and-slow-css/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.squarefree.com/2003/10/29/google-cache-and-slow-css/</link>
	<description>Jesse Ruderman on Firefox, security, and more</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 14:16:16 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: alanjstr</title>
		<link>http://www.squarefree.com/2003/10/29/google-cache-and-slow-css/#comment-161</link>
		<dc:creator>alanjstr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.squarefree.com/test/wp15/wordpress/?p=60#comment-161</guid>
		<description>Completely unrelated to today's post:  Have you considered changing your RSS feed to 2.0?

It would solve your Category problem, I think.

&lt;a href="http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss#ltcategorygtSubelementOfLtitemgt"&gt;http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss#ltcategorygtSubelementOfLtitemgt&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Completely unrelated to today&#8217;s post:  Have you considered changing your RSS feed to 2.0?</p>
<p>It would solve your Category problem, I think.</p>
<p><a href="http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss#ltcategorygtSubelementOfLtitemgt">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss#ltcategorygtSubelementOfLtitemgt</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jesse Ruderman</title>
		<link>http://www.squarefree.com/2003/10/29/google-cache-and-slow-css/#comment-162</link>
		<dc:creator>Jesse Ruderman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.squarefree.com/test/wp15/wordpress/?p=60#comment-162</guid>
		<description>Google Cache pages have a link:

"This cached page may reference images which are no longer available. Click here for the cached text only."

Clicking that link strips stylesheets in addition to images, so it is a good workaround for Mozilla users who figure out that they should cilck the link.  IE has poorer incremental rendering, so IE users can't even see that link until the stylesheet load times out.

Opera 7.54 seems to avoid this problem entirely -- I can see a cached page in Opera in about 1 second that I can't see in Mozilla or Internet Explorer for about half a minute.  I wonder if it takes an approach like &lt;a href="http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=84582#c11"&gt;http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=84582#c11&lt;/a&gt; or does something else.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Google Cache pages have a link:</p>
<p>&#8220;This cached page may reference images which are no longer available. Click here for the cached text only.&#8221;</p>
<p>Clicking that link strips stylesheets in addition to images, so it is a good workaround for Mozilla users who figure out that they should cilck the link.  IE has poorer incremental rendering, so IE users can&#8217;t even see that link until the stylesheet load times out.</p>
<p>Opera 7.54 seems to avoid this problem entirely &#8212; I can see a cached page in Opera in about 1 second that I can&#8217;t see in Mozilla or Internet Explorer for about half a minute.  I wonder if it takes an approach like <a href="http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=84582#c11">http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=84582#c11</a> or does something else.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
